4.6 Article

Acceptance and purchase intent of US consumers for nonwheat rice butter cakes

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
卷 72, 期 2, 页码 S92-S97

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00256.x

关键词

butter cake; celiac sprue; consumer acceptance; jasmine rice flour; purchase intent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated consumer acceptance and purchase intent of nonwheat butter cake formulations prepared with Thai jasmine rice flour. Three nonwheat rice butter cakes were prepared with varying amounts of powdered emulsifier (propylene glycol ester:diacetyl tartaric acid ester of monoglyceride, 8:2) at 0% (product A), 7.5% (product B), and 15% (product C) of the margarine content (15%) in the cake formulation. A commercial wheat-based butter cake served as the control. Consumers (n = 400) evaluated acceptability of 9 sensory attributes using a 9-point hedonic scale. Overall acceptance, and purchase intent were determined with a binomial (yes/no) scale. At least 81% of consumers accepted products B and C, of which 42.1% and 47%, respectively, would purchase the products if commercially available. Product A was neither liked nor disliked with an overall liking score of 5.39. The butter cake products were differentiated by textural acceptability, (overall texture, softness, and moistness) with a canonical correlation of 0.71 to 0.79. Overall, liking and taste influenced overall acceptance and purchase intent. Odor influenced purchase intent (P = 0.0014), but not overall acceptance. The odds ratio of overall liking was 3.462 for purchase intent, indicating the probability of the product being purchased is 3.462 times higher (than not being purchased, P < 0.0001) with every 1-unit increase of the overall liking score. Based on the logit model, overall acceptance and purchase intent could be predicted with 89.3% and 83.30% accuracy, respectively. The study demonstrated feasibility of completely substituting wheat flour with Thai jasmine rice flour for production of butter cake products acceptable to American consumers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据