4.6 Article

Prenatal corticosterone exposure results in altered AT1/AT2, nephron deficit and hypertension in the rat offspring

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 579, 期 2, 页码 503-513

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125773

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maternal treatment with the synthetic glucocorticoid, dexamethasone has been reported to result in a nephron deficit and development of hypertension in the offspring of rats. However, it is not known whether elevated maternal corticosterone (CORT), the natural glucocorticoid, has similar effects on blood pressure and nephron endowment. The present study investigated the effects of CORT (0.8 mg kg(-1) day(-1)) administration on embryonic day 14 (E14) and E15 of pregnancy on: (1) nephron number at postnatal day 30 (PN30); (2) blood pressure at PN120; and (3) receptors of the renal renin-angiotensin system (RRAS) (AT(1)Ra, AT(1)Rb and AT(2)Ra) during both embryonic (E16, E20) and adolescent (PN30) life. Plasma CORT concentrations were approximately doubled 30 min after injection. Unbiased stereological analysis revealed that maternal CORT treatment resulted in a nephron deficit of 21 and 19% in male and female offspring, respectively. Mean arterial pressures were significantly elevated in offspring of both sexes from the CORT group. Real-time PCR revealed that CORT treatment increased expression of AT(1)Ra and AT(2)R at E16, and at PN30. Expression of AT(1)Rb was downregulated in embryonic life but upregulated at PN30. We believe that these results are the first to demonstrate that maternal CORT treatment results in a nephron deficit and development of hypertension in the rat offspring. Changes in the RRAS may be contributing to these phenotypes. Critically, this study suggests that increased but physiological levels of the natural glucocorticoid can programme similar changes to those seen with pharmacological doses of the synthetic glucocorticoid. This may have important implications for women experiencing significant stress during pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据