4.3 Article

Two-year follow-up of anti-transglutaminase autoantibodies among celiac children on gluten-free diet:: Comparison of IgG and IgA

期刊

AUTOIMMUNITY
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 117-121

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08916930601119260

关键词

tissue transgluteminase; celiac disease; follow-up; gluten-free diet; autoantibodies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To investigate the evolution of IgA and IgG autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase (tTGase) in celiac patients on gluten-free diet (GFD). Methods: IgA and IgG anti-tTGAse autoantibodies was evaluated in 93 patients (58 girls and 35 boys, mean age 3.56 +/- 3.04 years; range 0.94-17.5 years) at diagnosis of celiac disease and after 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, 24 months of follow-up on GFD. Autoantibodies were measured with a radioassay using in vitro transcribed-translated human recombinant tTGAse, and immune complexes were precipitated with protein A- or anti-IgA-agarose for IgG and IgA, respectively. Results: Autoantibody titers started to decline very soon after removal of gluten, and no significant differences in the decrease rate between IgG and IgA antibodies were observed. After 6 months on GFD, 63 and 49% of the patients were negative for IgG and IgA, respectively. Patients who remained auto antibody-positive after 6 months of treatment initially presented with significantly higher titers at the time of diagnosis compared to patients that had lost their antibodies by that time. Children diagnosed before the age of two years presented lower autoantibody titers, while patients positive for HLA-DR7 had higher anti-tTGase levels, especially IgA. Conclusions: There are no differences in the performance of IgG and IgA class autoantibodies in the evolution of celiac patients. Between 3 and 6 months on GFD, almost half of the patients are negative for anti-tTGase antibodies. In our experience, they can be of help in evaluating compliance with diet, at least during the first two years of treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据