4.0 Article

Relationship of imprecise corollary discharge in schizophrenia to auditory hallucinations

期刊

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 64, 期 3, 页码 286-296

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.3.286

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 58262, MH 40052, K02 MH067967, MH 067967, R01 MH058262] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: A forward model of intended thoughts and actions prepares sensory cortex for sensations that are a consequence of those actions. Imprecision of the corollary discharge in schizophrenia may contribute to the misperception of inner experiences and thoughts as voices or auditory hallucinations. Objectives: To assess the precision of the forward model in schizophrenia using the N100 component of the auditory event-related potential to speech that is altered or unaltered, in real time, as it is being spoken. To assess the relationship between auditory hallucinations and the imprecision of the corollary discharge. Design: Prospective case-control study. Setting: Community mental health centers and Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif. Participants: Twenty patients with schizophrenia and 17 sex- and age-matched healthy control subjects. Main Outcome Measures: N100 responses to auditory feedback, which was altered by pitch-shifting the self-voice, substituting an alien voice, or pitch-shifting the alien voice. On each trial, subjects judged whether feedback was self, other, or unsure. Clinical ratings were used to assess severity of auditory hallucinations in patients. Results: In controls, N100 to unaltered self-voice feedback was dampened relative to N100 to altered self-voice or alien auditory feedback. This pattern was not seen in hallucinating patients. This imprecision correlated with the severity of hallucinations and with the percentage of misattribution errors. Conclusion: These data support a connection between auditory verbal hallucinations and the imprecision of the corollary discharge heralding the sensory consequences of thoughts and actions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据