4.5 Article

A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: Do cell properties reflect metastatic potential?

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 92, 期 5, 页码 1784-1791

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.083097

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atomic force microscopy has rapidly become a valuable tool for quantifying the biophysical properties of single cells. The interpretation of atomic force microscopy-based indentation tests, however, is highly dependent on the use of an appropriate theoretical model of the testing configuration. In this study, a novel, thin-layer viscoelastic model for stress relaxation was developed to quantify the mechanical properties of chondrosarcoma cells in different configurations to examine the hypothesis that viscoelastic properties reflect the metastatic potential and invasiveness of the cell using three well-characterized human chondrosarcoma cell lines (JJ012, FS090, 105KC) that show increasing chondrocytic differentiation and decreasing malignancy, respectively. Single-cell stress relaxation tests were conducted at 2 h and 2 days after plating to determine cell mechanical properties in either spherical or spread morphologies and analyzed using the new theoretical model. At both time points, JJ012 cells had the lowest moduli of the cell lines examined, whereas FS090 typically had the highest. At 2 days, all cells showed an increase in stiffness and a decrease in apparent viscosity compared to the 2-h time point. Fluorescent labeling showed that the F-actin structure in spread cells was significantly different between FS090 cells and JJ012/105KC cells. Taken together with results of previous studies, these findings indicate that cell transformation and tumorigenicity are associated with a decrease in cell modulus and apparent viscosity, suggesting that cell mechanical properties may provide insight into the metastatic potential and invasiveness of a cell.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据