4.5 Article

Radiographic measurements of the intercondylar notch: Are they accurate?

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.003

关键词

impingement; intercondylar notch; anterior cruciate ligament; stenosis; radiographic measurements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of radiographic measurements of the intercondylar notch. Methods: Radiographs of 10 cadaveric knees were obtained via the 3 methods reported in the literature (Holvablad 45 degrees, Holmblad 70 degrees, and Rosenberg views), after removal of the patella and surrounding soft tissues. The anterior outlet of the intercondylar notch of each knee was then outlined with barium paste, and radiography was repeated. A total of 1,770 radiographs were obtained for the 10 knees. Six measurements of the anterior outlet of the intercondylar notch were made from each radiograph and corrected for magnification. Finally, the notch width index was calculated. Caliper measurements were subsequently made of each knee to compare the size of the anterior outlet of the notch with the radiographic measurements with and without barium. Results: There were statistically significant differences in caliper measurements compared with all but one radiographic measurement obtained from the Holmblad 45 degrees, Holmblad 70 degrees, and Rosenberg views. The radiographs taken with barium outlining the intercondylar notch clearly showed the inability to accurately identify the anterior outlet on radiographs. Conclusions: Even under optimal conditions, correcting for technique, projection, and magnification, most of the radiographic measurements of the anterior outlet of the intercondylar notch were inaccurate. The notch width index calculated from the Hohnblad 70 degrees view appears to be the only accurate radiographic measurement. Clinical Relevance: This controlled laboratory study shows that clinicians should use caution when basing conclusions on radiographic measurements of the intercondylar notch.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据