4.7 Article

Short-term soil mixing quantified with fallout radionuclides

期刊

GEOLOGY
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 243-246

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC AMER, INC
DOI: 10.1130/G23355A.1

关键词

bioturbation; erosion; fallout; mixing; soil

类别

资金

  1. Division Of Earth Sciences
  2. Directorate For Geosciences [0829458] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil mixing plays a significant role in contaminant transport, carbon sequestration, and landscape evolution, yet the rates and driving mechanisms are poorly constrained. Here we use depth profiles and advection-diffusion modeling of fallout nuclides to quantify differences in short-term (< 100 yr) physical soil mixing across contrasting landscapes. We constrain advection in soils using the distribution of cosmogenic Be-7 and weapons-derived isotopes, and quantify mixing with a steady-state model of vertical Ph-210 transport. On a forested landscape in the Bega Valley in southeastern Australia and on grasslands in Marin County, California, where bioturbation is documented as the dominant sediment transport mechanism, we calculate diffusion-like mixing coefficients of 1-2 cm(2) yr(-1). In montane forest soils of northern New England, we observe little field evidence of short-term mixing, and find that the traditional advection-diffusion model fails to describe Ph-210 profiles. Because nuclide profiles here can be described with a simple model of litterfall, organic matter decay, and radioactive decay, we argue that diffusion-like processes are barely active on short time scales, and that the advection-diffusion model overestimates diffusion-like transport. While animal bioturbation and soil freezing cycles have little effect on the fate of elements in New England, physical soil mixing drives transport at Bega Valley and Marin County. We suggest that the absence of soil stirring that we quantify in New England forests may explain the slow physical erosion here (similar to 0.2 cm/k.y.) relative to the actively bioturbated soils of Bega Valley and Marin County (5-10 cm/k.y.).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据