4.3 Article

Morphology and ultrastructure of a bacteria cultivation organ:: The antennal glands of female European beewolves, Philanthus triangulum (Hymenoptera, Crabronidae)

期刊

ARTHROPOD STRUCTURE & DEVELOPMENT
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2006.08.003

关键词

symbiosis; class 3 gland cells; streptomycetes; ultrastructure; 3D-reconstruction; rough endoplasmatic reticulum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Females of a solitary digger wasp, the European beewolf (Philanthus triangulum F.), cultivate symbiotic bacteria of the genus Streptomyces in specialized antennal glands. The streptomycetes are secreted in the subterranean brood cells and protect the offspring against mould fungi. We reconstructed the complex morphology of the antennal glands using 3D-visualization software, investigated the ultrastructure of the glands, and examine the role of the antennal glands as organs for the cultivation of the symbiotic bacteria. The bacteria are cultivated in five antennomeres within large reservoirs that consist of two slightly bent lobes. Each gland reservoir is bordered by a monolayered epithelium lined with a partially reinforced cuticle and when completely filled with bacteria it comprises about half of the antennomere's volume. The opening of the reservoir is covered by gelatinous appendage of the cuticle. The cells of the monolayered epithelium bordering each reservoir show basal invaginations, apical microvilli and numerous vesicles. Each reservoir is surrounded by approximately 400 class 3 gland units that are connected to the reservoir lumen through conducting canals. The class 3 gland cells contain numerous vesicles and a high density of rough endoplasmatic reticulum. In the reservoir lumen, large numbers of symbiotic Streptomyces bacteria are embedded in secretion droplets. Thus, the bacteria are apparently provided with large amounts of nutrients via the gland epithelium and the class 3 gland cell units. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据