4.6 Article

Characterization of airborne molds, endotoxins, and glucans in homes in New Orleans after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 73, 期 5, 页码 1630-1634

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01973-06

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES009089, P30ES05605, P30ES009089, P30ES00000243, P30 ES005605] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In August and September 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita caused breeches in the New Orleans, LA, levee system, resulting in catastrophic flooding. The city remained flooded for several weeks, leading to extraordinary mold growth in homes. To characterize the potential risks of mold exposures, we measured airborne molds and markers of molds and bacteria in New Orleans area homes. In October 2005, we collected air samples from 5 mildly water-damaged houses, 15 moderately to heavily water-damaged houses, and 11 outdoor locations. The air filters were analyzed for culturable fungi, spores, (1 -> 3,1 -> 6)-beta-D-glucans, and endotoxins. Culturable fungi were significantly higher in the moderately/heavily water-damaged houses (geometric mean = 67,000 CFU/m(3)) than in the mildly water-damaged houses (geometric mean = 3,700 CFU/m(3)) (P = 0.02). The predominant molds found were Aspergillus niger, Penicillium spp., Trichoderma, and Paecilomyces. The indoor and outdoor geometric means for endotoxins were 22.3 endotoxin units (EU)/m(3) and 10.5 EU/m(3), respectively, and for (1 -> 3,1 -> 6)-beta-D-glucans were 1.7 mu g/m(3) and 0.9 mu g/m(3), respectively. In the moderately/heavily water-damaged houses, the geometric means were 31.3 EU/m(3) for endotoxins and 1.8 mu g/m(3) for (1 -> 3,1 -> 6)-beta-D-glucans. Molds, endotoxins, and fungal glucans were detected in the environment after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in New Orleans at concentrations that have been associated with health effects. The species and concentrations were different from those previously reported for non-water-damaged buildings in the southeastern United States.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据