4.8 Article

Biocompatibility evaluation of silk fibroin with peripheral nerve tissues and cells in vitro

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 28, 期 9, 页码 1643-1652

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.004

关键词

silk fibroin; dorsal root ganglia; Schwann cell; biocompatibility; cytotoxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silk-based materials have been used in the field of bone or ligament tissue engineering. In order to explore the feasibility of using purified silk fibroin to construct artificial nerve grafts, it is necessary to evaluate the biocompatibility of silk fibroin material with peripheral nerve tissues and cells. We cultured rat dorsal root ganglia (DRG) on the substrate made up of silk fibroin fibers and observed the cell outgrowth from DRG during culture by using light and electron microscopy coupled with immunocytochemistry. On the other hand, we cultured Schwann cells from rat sciatic nerves in the silk fibroin extract fluid and examined the changes of Schwann cells after different times of culture. The results of light microscopy, MTT test and cell cycle analysis showed that Schwann cells cultured in the silk fibroin extract fluid showed no significant difference in their morphology, cell viability and proliferation as compared to that in plain L15 medium. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in expression of the factors secreted by Schwann cells, such as nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and S-100, between Schwann cells cultured in the silk fibroin extraction fluid and in plain L15 medium by the aid of immunocytochemistry, RT-PCR and Western analysis. Collectively, these data indicate that silk fibroin has good biocompatibility with DRG and is also beneficial to the survival of Schwann cells without exerting any significant cytotoxic effects on their phenotype or functions, thus providing an experimental foundation for the development of silk fibroin as a candidate material for nerve tissue engineering applications. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据