4.5 Article

Transcript levels of the intermediate size or grey zone fragile X mental retardation 1 alleles are raised, and correlate with the number of CGG repeats

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 200-204

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043950

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Grey zone or intermediate alleles are one of the three recognised classes of the X-linked fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene showing intergenerational instability. These classes are defined according to the number of CGG repeats in the FMR1 59-untranslated region. Although large CGG expansions (. 200 repeats) cause a neurodevelopmental anomaly through silencing of the gene, resulting in a deficit of FMR1 specific protein, smaller expansions ( approximately 55 - 200 repeats) are associated with an increased transcription and late-onset specific phenotypes. Those alleles with a CGG repeat number ranging between approximately 41 and 55 are relatively poorly defined with regard to both transcriptional and translational activity, and also potential phenotypic effects. Methods and results: Based on a sample of 33 males carrying FMR1 alleles within the grey zone range, defined here as 41 - 60 CGGs, we show an increased transcriptional activity relative to that seen in common alleles ( 5 - 40 CGGS). This is the first study to report a significant relationship between FMR1 mRNA levels and CGG repeat number within the grey zone range (p < 0.001). From a piecewise linear regression model, the threshold for onset of the increase in mRNA levels as a function of CGG repeat size has been determined at approximately 39 repeats ( standard error (SE) 3.24), and that for the reduction in the rate of this increase at approximately 54 repeats (SE 4.27). Conclusions: The ambiguities associated with the definition and transcription dynamics of the FMR1 gene within the grey zone range are dealt with. There may be specific phenotypes associated with the toxic gain-offunction'' effect of raised mRNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据