4.7 Article

MHC class I chain-related gene B (MICB) is associated with rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 426-430

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel331

关键词

rheumatoid arthritis; MHC; HLA-DR; MICB; MICA; I kappa BL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. Several recent studies have shown that the MHC class III region, located telomeric to HLA-DRB1, contains an additional genetic factor that predisposes to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study, we investigate whether inhibitor of kappa B-like (I kappa BL), MICB or MICA located in the MHC class III region are the second susceptibility gene associated with RA. Methods. A total of 154 healthy controls and 140 RA patients were genotyped for HLA-DRB1, MICA, MICB and the polymorphism -62 of the I kappa BL gene. Results. A significant increase of HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) alleles was detected in RA patients (61.4 vs 43.5%, P-c = 0.01, OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.3-3.3). Among SE alleles, the HLA-DRB1*0401 (13.5 vs 5.1%, P-c = 0.04, OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.3-8.1) and HLA-DRB1*0404 (6.4 vs 1.2%, P = 0.02, P-c = NS) showed the most significantly association with RA. No increase of risk was associated with HLA-DRB1*01. Remarkably, the allele MICB*004 was also significantly associated with RA susceptibility (40.7 vs 23.3%, P-c = 0.01, OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.3-3.7). MICB*004 was in linkage disequilibrium with HLA-DRB1*0404 (lambda(s) = 0.33) and HLA-DRB1*0405 (lambda(s) = 0.34). However, MICB*004 was also increased in HLA-DRB1 SE negative patients (37 vs 21.5%, P = 0.04). No significant association between I kappa BL and MICA with RA was found. Conclusions. MICB*004 allele was associated with RA susceptibility. This allele was in linkage disequilibrium with HLA-DRB1*0404 and DRB1*0405. The association of MICB with RA susceptibility and the functional role of MIC genes in the pathogenesis of RA converts MICB into a candidate to be an additional MHC gene associated with RA susceptibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据