4.5 Article

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the estrogenic, androgenic, and progestagenic potential of two cyclic siloxanes

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 96, 期 1, 页码 145-153

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl185

关键词

D-4; D-5; octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane; decamethylcyclopentasiloxane; silicone; siloxane; estrogen receptor alpha and beta; androgen; progesterone; luciferase reporter gene; RUA; estrogenic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of these experiments was to determine the potential estrogenic, androgenic, and progestagenic activity of two cyclic siloxanes, octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D-4) and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D-5). Receptor-binding experiments and a luciferase reporter gene assay were used to determine if the materials were able to bind and activate either the estrogen receptors (ERs) or progesterone receptors (PRs)-alpha or beta. The rat uterotrophic assay (RUA) for estrogenic activity and the Hershberger assay for androgenic activity were utilized as the in vivo assays. For the ER-binding studies, D-4 was shown to bind to ER alpha but not to ER beta. D-5 did not bind to either of the two receptors. D-4 activated the reporter gene at 10 mu M, while D-5 was considered negative in the estrogen reporter gene assay. Neither material was a ligand for the PRs. Both the RUA and Hershberger assays were conducted using whole-body inhalation of the two materials for 16 h/day. D-4 resulted in a small but significant increase in both wet and blotted uterine weight as well as increases in both luminal and glandular epithelial cell height in both Sprague Dawley and Fischer 344 rats. D-5 was negative in both rat strains, indicating that D-5 does not possess estrogenic activity. Neither material possessed any significant antiestrogenic activity. Both materials were negative in the Hershberger assay indicating that neither material possesses any significant androgenic activity. Our studies have shown that D-4 exhibits a low affinity for ER alpha in vitro and a weakly estrogenic response in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据