4.2 Article

Introduction of enhanced recovery for elective caesarean section enabling next day discharge: a tertiary centre experience

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.01.003

关键词

Enhanced recovery; Elective; Caesarean section

资金

  1. Department of Health [NIHR-CS-011-030] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [NIHR-CS-011-030] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The widespread adoption of enhanced recovery programmes in various surgical specialties has resulted in patient benefits including reduced morbidity, reduced length of stay and an earlier return to normal activities. This evidence, along with the increased financial pressures in the UK National Health Service, has led many units to consider introducing such a programme for obstetric surgery. We report our experience in setting up an enhanced recovery programme for women undergoing elective caesarean section and a prospective analysis of factors that influence length of stay. Methods: An enhanced recovery pathway was designed by a multidisciplinary team and introduced in March 2012. Factors influencing length of stay were determined using a log normal model. Results: The proportion of women discharged on Day 1 increased from 1.6% in the first quarter of 2012 to 25.2% in the first quarter of 2014. The 30-day readmission rate was 4.4% for those discharged on Day 1 and 5.6% for Day 2. Earlier gestation, multiple birth, intention to breast feed, longer surgery and more time in the post-anaesthesia recovery unit were all independently associated with a longer postoperative stay. Women presenting for obstetric surgery with the indication one previous caesarean section were more likely to leave hospital earlier compared to most other indications. Conclusion: An enhanced recovery programme was successfully introduced into our unit. Many of the interventions were straightforward and could be adopted easily elsewhere. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据