期刊
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 243-249出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.07.017
关键词
Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin; immunoassay; lateral flow test; clinical samples; botulism
Four lateral flow assays (LFAs) were evaluated for the detection of purified botulinum neurotoxin A, toxin complex, and unpurified culture supernatant. They included the BioThreat (Tetracore, Rockville, MD), SMART (New Horizons Diagnostics, Columbia, MD), BADD (ADVNT Biotechnologies, Phoenix, AZ), and RAMP (Response Biomedical, Burnaby, BC, Canada) assays. BioThreat and SMART did not detect the purified toxin. The best sensitivity was achieved with the RAMP test (50 ng mL(-1)). BioThreat and SMART measured as low as 10 ng mL(-1) of the toxin complex. Specificity data differed among the tests. BADD gave false-positive signals with uninoculated bacterial culture medium. BioThreat and RAMP were further evaluated with clinical sample matrices (serum, gastric, and rectum contents from pigs). Because of matrix effects and a generally low positive response, the assays are unsuitable for the direct detection of the toxin. However, the LFAs can be a helpful tool in screening bacterial cultures for toxigenic Clostridium botulinum, if further validated according to the laboratory needs. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据