4.3 Article

Evaluation of lateral flow assays for the detection of botulinum neurotoxin type A and their application in laboratory diagnosis of botulism

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.07.017

关键词

Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin; immunoassay; lateral flow test; clinical samples; botulism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four lateral flow assays (LFAs) were evaluated for the detection of purified botulinum neurotoxin A, toxin complex, and unpurified culture supernatant. They included the BioThreat (Tetracore, Rockville, MD), SMART (New Horizons Diagnostics, Columbia, MD), BADD (ADVNT Biotechnologies, Phoenix, AZ), and RAMP (Response Biomedical, Burnaby, BC, Canada) assays. BioThreat and SMART did not detect the purified toxin. The best sensitivity was achieved with the RAMP test (50 ng mL(-1)). BioThreat and SMART measured as low as 10 ng mL(-1) of the toxin complex. Specificity data differed among the tests. BADD gave false-positive signals with uninoculated bacterial culture medium. BioThreat and RAMP were further evaluated with clinical sample matrices (serum, gastric, and rectum contents from pigs). Because of matrix effects and a generally low positive response, the assays are unsuitable for the direct detection of the toxin. However, the LFAs can be a helpful tool in screening bacterial cultures for toxigenic Clostridium botulinum, if further validated according to the laboratory needs. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据