4.7 Article

Mortality in patients treated for Cushing's disease is increased, compared with patients treated for nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma

期刊

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-2112

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Increased mortality in patients with pituitary tumors after surgical treatment has been reported. However, it is unknown to what extent excess mortality is caused by pituitary tumors and their treatment in general and to what extent by previous exposure to hormonal overproduction. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare mortality between patients treated for Cushing's disease and nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas ( NFMAs). Design: This was a follow-up study. Patients: We included 248 consecutive patients with pituitary adenomas treated by transsphenoidal surgery in our hospital for NFMAs ( n = 174) and ACTH-producing adenomas ( n = 74). The mean duration of follow-up after surgery was 10.1 +/- 7.2 yr for the whole cohort. Outcome Measures: The standardized mortality ratio ( SMR) was calculated for the whole cohort and also for the two diseases separately. Cox regression analysis was used to compare mortality in patients with Cushing's disease with NFMA patients. Results: Patients with Cushing's disease ( 39.1 +/- 16.1 yr) were significantly younger at time of operation than NFMA patients ( 55.3 +/- 13.4 yr). The SMR for the whole cohort was 1.41 [ 95% confidence interval ( CI), 1.05 - 1.86]. The SMR in NFMA patients was 1.24 ( 95% CI, 0.85 - 1.74) vs. 2.39 ( 95% CI, 1.22 - 3.9) in patients with Cushing's disease. In patients with Cushing's disease, compared with NFMAs, the age-adjusted mortality was significantly increased: hazard ratio 2.35 ( 95% CI, 1.13 - 4.09, P = 0.008). Conclusions: Mortality in patients previously treated for Cushing's disease is increased, compared with patients treated for NFMAs. This implies that previous, transient overexposure to cortisol is associated with increased mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据