4.5 Article

Combinations of cytochrome P-450 genotypes and risk of early-onset lung cancer in Caucasians and African Americans: A population-based study

期刊

LUNG CANCER
卷 55, 期 3, 页码 255-262

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.11.002

关键词

lung cancer; cytochrome p-450; polyporphisms; African Americans; Caucasians; smoking

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA022453, N01-PC25005, R01-CA60691, R01 CA060691, P30CA22453] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymorphisms in CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genes in humans are associated with reduction of enzymatic activity towards several substrates, including those found in tobacco smoke. To investigate the potential role these polymorphisms have as modulators of early-onset lung cancer risk, a poputation-based case-control study involving early-onset Lung cancer cases was performed. Biological samples were available for 383 individuals diagnosed prior to 50 years of age identified from the metropolitan Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and 449 age, race and sex-matched controls ascertained through random digit dialing. Genotype frequencies varied significantly by race for CYP1A1 Ile(462)Val and CYP1B1 Leu(432)Val genotypes, so all analyses were stratified by race. No association was seen between lung cancer risk and polymorphisms in CYP1A1 Msp1 or CYP1B1 Leu(432)Val for Caucasians or African Americans, after adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, pack years of smoking and family history of lung cancer. In Caucasians, those with the Ile/Val genotype at CYP1A1 Ile(462)Val Locus were at decreased risk of having lung cancer compared to those with the Ile/Ile genotype, after adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, pack years of smoking and family history of cancer (OR = 0.41 95% Cl 0.19-0.90). These results were not replicated among the African American population, nor were they modified by amount of smoking. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据