4.3 Article

High iNOS mRNA and protein levels during early third trimester suggest a role for NO in prelabor cervical ripening in the bovine

期刊

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 74, 期 3, 页码 378-385

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20546

关键词

cervix; cervical ripening; nitric oxide; inducible nitric oxide synthase; pregnancy; parturition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitric oxide (NO) plays a key role in the processes leading to cervical softening prior to labor. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) contributes most to the increased production of NO during labor, as demonstrated in the rat cervix, or at term pregnancy in women. Changes in expression of iNOS during late gestation have not yet been studied longitudinally in any species, because repeatedly taking biopsies could not be performed. NOS mRNA (n = 6) and protein expression (n = 3) in serial cervical biopsies of pregnant pluriparous cows taken around days 225, 250, and 275 of pregnancy and within 1.5 hr after calving (d225, d250, d275 and parturition biopsies, respectively) were measured using quantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting. iNOS mRNA expression decreased from the d225 biopsy onwards, differences being significant between the d250 and d275 (P < 0.05) and between the d275 and parturition biopsies (P < 0.05). iNOS protein expression decreased from d225 to d250 onwards. Immunohistochemical analysis of biopsies showed, besides positive staining in endothelium and epithelium, which remained unchanged at different time points, that iNOS expressing cells in the connective tissue cells of early biopsies were predominantly spindle shaped (mostly smooth muscle cells and some fibroblasts). In the parturition biopsies, NOS reactivity was mainly found in mononuclear leucocytes. These results lead us to suggest that iNOS from spindle shaped cells is involved in prepartum cervical ripening, while iNOS in mononuclear inflammatory cells may be important for local tissue repair mechanisms during postpartum cervical involution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据