4.6 Article

Enhanced angiogenesis with multimodal cell-based gene therapy

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
卷 83, 期 3, 页码 1110-1120

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.050

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. We evaluated the synergism of transient vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) overexpression on angiogenesis and left ventricular (LV) function after bone marrow cell (BMC) transplantation, to determine the potential of multimodal cell-based gene therapy for myocardial repair. Methods. Female Lewis rats underwent coronary ligation 3 weeks before transplantation with male donor BMC, BMC transfected with VEGF (BMC+VEGF), bFGF (BMC+bFGF), VEGF and bFGF (BMC+VEGF+bFGF), or medium (control) (n = 3 each group at 3 days, 1 week and 2 weeks; n = 6 each group at 4 weeks; n = 75 total). Three days, I week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after transplantation, transgene expression was quantitated by real-time polymerase chain reaction, angiogenesis by quantitative histology, and LV function by echocardiography. At 4 weeks, regional perfusion was quantitated with microspheres. Results. The VEGF and bFGF were expressed transiently over 4 weeks. At 1 week, VEGF expression was greatest in BMC+VEGF and BMC+VEGF+bFGF hearts (p < 0.05), while bFGF expression was greatest in BMC+bFGF and BMC+VEGF+bFGF rats (p < 0.05). Regional perfusion and vascular densities in the scar were lowest in control, intermediate in BMC, BMC+VEGF, BMC+bFGF, and greatest in BMC+VEGF+bFGF (p < 0.05). Four weeks after transplantation, LV ejection fraction was lowest in control, intermediate in BMC, BMC+VEGF and BMC+bFGF, and greatest in BMC+VEGF+bFGF (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The VEGF and bFGF transgenes were expressed transiently and exerted a powerful synergism on the angiogenic effect of cell transplantation, but did not normalize perfusion or function. The future of cell transplantation may lie in multimodal cell-based gene therapy, in combination with other novel therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据