4.4 Article

Clinical, psychiatric and manometric profile of cyclic vomiting syndrome in adults and response to tricyclic therapy

期刊

NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 196-202

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00867.x

关键词

abdominal pain; cyclic vomiting syndrome; electrogastrogram; gastric emptying; nausea and vomiting; tricyclic therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our goal was to investigate 31 adult patients (mean age 29 years, range 18-62 years) meeting Rome II criteria for cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS). All subjects completed a clinical questionnaire, a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) and Zung Depression Inventory. Gastric emptying time was assessed in 30 subjects and electrogastrogram (EGG) in 11 between acute attacks. Twenty-seven patients treated with amitriptyline completed a follow-up questionnaire. The mean age of onset of the patients was 30 years (range 14-53 years) and cycles of nausea and vomiting were accompanied by often-severe epigastric and diffuse abdominal pain. A typical attack ranged from 1 to 14 days, with the majority being 4-6 days. The HAM-A revealed that 84% had an anxiety disorder, and based on Zung Depression Inventory 78% suffered from mild-to-severe depression. Only 4 (13%) patients reported migraine, but 14 had a family history of migraine. Gastric emptying time was rapid in 23 (77%), normal in 4 and delayed in 3. The EGG was abnormal in 7 of 11 patients, with 4 having tachygastria. Of 13 patients using marijuana, 7 had symptom relief, while 2 had resolution of CVS after stopping use. The overall treatment experience in the 24 patients receiving amitriptyline up to 1 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for at least 3 months indicated that 93% had decreased symptoms and 26% achieved full remission. Cyclic vomiting syndrome in adults has the following hallmarks: prominence of accompanying abdominal pain and increased prevalence of anxiety and depression, rapid gastric emptying and tachygastric EGG, and successful suppression of attacks by chronic amitriptyline therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据