4.5 Article

Cleaved inflammatory lactoferrin peptides in parotid saliva of periodontitis patients

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 7, 页码 1498-1508

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.09.003

关键词

lactoferrin; saliva; inflammation; periodontitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactoferrin (Lf) is a member of the transferrin family of iron-binding anti-bacterial proteins, present in most exocrine secretions, such as saliva, and plays an important role in mucosal defense. In this study, we identified small Lf peptides with Con A low-affinity in the parotid saliva of chronic periodontitis patients by Con A two-dimensional immunoelectrophoresis, Con A affinity chromatography and Western blotting using anti-human Lf polyclonal Ab. N-terminal amino acid sequencing of the four Con A low-affinity Lf peptides confirmed them to be fragments of intact U. The detection ratio of the proteinase 3 (PR3)-like activity was elevated in the parotid saliva of periodontitis patients and was associated with the severity of clinical symptoms. PR3 protein was also detected in the parotid saliva of periodontitis patients, and PR3, but not human leukocyte elastase and cathepsin G, degraded intact Lf. Con A low-affinity saliva Lf peptides showed no anti-bacterial activity against Escherichia coli, and had a reduced iron-chelating capacity. Con A low-affinity saliva Lf peptides, PR3-treated Lf preparation and two of four synthetic polypeptides induced the production of interleukin IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and IL-8, and the activation of NF-kappa B in human oral epithelial HSC-2 cells. Furthermore, concentrations of the Lf peptides in the parotid saliva of periodontitis patients were increased with a correlation to the severity of clinical symptoms. These results suggest that Lf in the parotid saliva of periodontitis patients was degraded into small peptides by the PR3-like activity with the capability to induce inflammatory mediators. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据