4.6 Article

Colonic neuropathological aspects in patients with intractable constipation due to obstructed defecation

期刊

MODERN PATHOLOGY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 367-374

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800748

关键词

constipation; enteric glial cells; enteric nervous system; outlet obstruction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the most frequent subtypes of constipation is represented by obstructed defecation, and it has recently been reported that these patients may have colonic motor abnormalities in addition to alterations of the anorectal area. However, it is unknown whether these patients display abnormalities of the enteric nervous system, as reported in other groups of constipated subjects. For this reason, we evaluated the neuropathologic aspects of the enteric nervous system in a homogeneous group of patients with obstructed defecation. Colonic specimens from 11 patients (nine women, age range 39-66 years) undergoing surgery for symptoms refractory to any therapeutic measure, including biofeedback training, were obtained and examined by means of conventional histological methods and immunohistochemistry (NSE, S100, c-Kit, formamide-mAb, Bcl-2, CD34, alfa- actin). Analysis of the specimens showed that the enteric neurons were significantly decreased only in the submucosal plexus of patients (P < 0.0001 vs controls), whereas the enteric glial cells of constipated patients were reduced in both the myenteric (P=0.018 vs controls) and the submucosal plexus (P=0.004 vs controls). No difference between patients and controls were found concerning c-Kit and CD34 expression, and the number of apoptotic neurons. These findings support the concept that at least a subgroup of patients with obstructed defecation and severe, intractable symptoms display abnormalities of the enteric nervous system, mostly related to the enteric glial cells. These findings might explain some of the pathophysiological abnormalities, and help to better understand this condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据