4.7 Article

Arrhythmogenesis in the heart: Multiscale modeling of the effects of defibrillation shocks and the role of electrophysiological heterogeneity

期刊

CHAOS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2430637

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0700278] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [G0700278] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0700278] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL063195, R01 HL067322, R01 HL082729, HL063195, R01 HL074283, HL067322, R01 HL082729-01A1, HL074283, R01 HL063195-07] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms of initiation of ventricular arrhythmias as well as those behind the complex spatiotemporal wave dynamics and its filament organization during ventricular fibrillation (VF) are the topic of intense research and debate. Mechanistic inquiry into the various mechanisms that lead to arrhythmia initiation and VF maintenance is hampered by the inability of current experimental techniques to resolve, with sufficient accuracy, electrical behavior confined to the depth of the ventricles. The objective of this article is to demonstrate that realistic 3D simulations of electrical activity in the heart are capable of bringing a new level of understanding of the mechanisms that underlie arrhythmia initiation and subsequent organization. The article does this by presenting the results of two multiscale simulation studies of ventricular electrical behavior. The first study aims to uncover the mechanisms responsible for rendering the ventricles vulnerable to electric shocks during a specific interval of time, the vulnerable window. The second study focuses on elucidating the role of electrophysiological heterogeneity, and specifically, differences in action potential duration in various ventricular structures, in VF organization. Both studies share common multiscale modeling approaches and analysis, including characterization of scroll-wave filament dynamics. (c) 2007 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据