4.7 Article

Alteration of sulfate and hydrogen metabolism in the human colon by changing intestinal transit rate

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 102, 期 3, 页码 624-633

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01020.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: Changes in intestinal transit rate are also implicated in the etiology of many colonic diseases and strongly influence many metabolic processes in the colon. We set out to investigate whether intestinal transit time could influence the activity of the hydrogen-consuming bacterial flora and sulfate metabolism. METHODS: Normal volunteers underwent four interventions while taking a low-sulfate diet: placebo, sulfate supplements, or sulfate supplements with either senna or loperamide. Stools were cultured and analyzed for sulfate, sulfide, methionine, sulfate reduction rates, methionine reduction rates, acetic acid production rates, methane production rates, short-chain fatty acids, and bile acids. Urine was analyzed for sulfate. RESULTS: The addition of sulfate alone increased fecal and urinary excretion of sulfate, fecal sulfide, sulfate reduction rates, and acetic acid production rates; it reduced fecal methanogenic bacterial concentrations. Faster intestinal transit increased fecal sulfate, sulfide, bile acids, the reduction rates of sulfate, and methionine and the production rates of acetic acid. Reduction in fecal methanogens and methane production was seen. The reverse effects were seen with loperamide. CONCLUSIONS: Both sulfate supplements and changes in intestinal transit rate markedly alter the activity of the colonic bacterial flora with respect to sulfate metabolism and hydrogen disposal. Dietary influences on intestinal transit and sulfate consumption may influence disease processes. While a variety of processes govern sulfate metabolism and hydrogen disposal, our knowledge is far from complete. How far the observed changes in sulfate metabolism seen in certain diseases are relevant to the pathogenesis of the disease or secondary to the disease itself is unclear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据