4.5 Article

Coffee consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2006.07.013

关键词

coffee; caffeine; coronary heart disease; myocardial infarction; meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: During the past three decades the relationship between habitual coffee drinking and coronary heart disease (CHD) has been assessed in numerous studies, with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to systematically examine the data published on the association between habitual coffee consumption and risk of CHID. Methods and results: Thirteen case-control and 10 cohort studies were included. Case-control studies incorporated 9487 cases of CHID and 27,747 controls, and cohort studies included a total of 403,631 participants that were followed for between 3 and 44 years. The summary of odds ratios (OR) for the case-control studies showed statistically significant associations between coffee consumption and CHID for the highest intake group (>4 cups/day), OR 1.83 (95% Cl 1.49-2.24; P < 0.0001), and for the second highest category (3-4 cups/day), OR 1.33 (95% Cl 1.04-1.71; P < 0.0001), white no significant association emerged for low daily coffee intake (<= 2 cups/day), OR 1.03 (95% CI 0.87-1.21; P = 0.45). The analysis of tong-term follow-up cohort studies did not show any association between the consumption of coffee and CHID, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.16 (95% CI 0.95-1.41; P = 0. 14) for the highest category, and 1.05 (95% C1 0.90-1.22; P = 0.57) and 1.04 (95% CI 0.90-1.19; P = 0.60) for the second and third highest categories, respectively. These results did not differ substantially when controlling for region of origin, fatal and non-fatal events, year of publication, and number of years of follow-up. Conclusions: Despite a significant association between high consumption of coffee and CHD reported among case-control. studies, no significant association between daily coffee consumption and CHD emerged from tong-term follow-up prospective cohort studies. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据