4.3 Article

Identification of functional cell adhesion molecules with a potential role in metastasis by a combination of in vivo phage display and in silico analysis

期刊

OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 41-57

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/omi.2006.0004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA72781] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organ-specific homing of malignant cells involves interactions mediated through cell adhesion molecules and their receptors on the cell surface. Identification of peptides that mimic these receptor-ligand interactions is critical for analyzing the functional role of these proteins and is therapeutically significant to target or block organ-specific homing of tumor cells. Following three cycles of in vivo biopanning using a phage display peptide library injected into mice, we identified 11 unique peptides that were specific for homing to lung, liver, bone marrow, or brain. We developed a bioinformatics strategy to identify putative cell adhesion molecules (CAM) involved in tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis based on identified organ-specific peptides. Structural information, including surface exposure and the binding preference of any of these residues in the identified proteins, was examined. These studies resulted in identification of Semaphorin 5A ( mouse, Sema5A; human, SEMA5A) and its receptor Plexin B3. The gene expression profile of these proteins in tumors and tumor cell lines was assessed using virtual microarray and serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) databases and was further confirmed using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Our data demonstrate an association between the expression of SEMA5A and Plexin B3 and the aggressiveness of pancreatic and prostate cancer cells. In summary, using a combined experimental and bioinformatics approach, we have identified functional tumor-specific CAMs, which may be critical for organ-specific metastasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据