4.0 Article

Pharmacological profiles in rats of novel antipsychotics with combined dopamine D2/serotonin 5-HT1A activity:: comparison with typical and atypical conventional antipsychotics

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 103-118

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3280ae6c96

关键词

antipsychotics; catalepsy; conditioned avoidance response; D-amphetamine; dopamine D-2 receptors; 5-HT1A receptors; methylphenidate; rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combining antagonist/partial agonist activity at dopamine D-2 and agonist activity at serotonin 5-HT1A receptors is one of the approaches that has recently been chosen to develop new generation antipsychotics, including bifeprunox, SSR181507 and SLV313. There have been, however, few comparative data on their pharmacological profiles. Here, we have directly compared a wide array of these novel dopamine D-2/5-HT1A and conventional antipsychotics in rat models predictive of antipsychotic activity. Potency of antipsychotics to antagonize conditioned avoidance, methylphenidate-induced behaviour and D-amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion correlated with their affinity at dopamine D-2 receptors. Potency against ketamine-induced hyperlocomotion was independent of affinity at dopamine D-2 or 5-HT1A receptors. Propensity to induce catalepsy, predictive of occurrence of extrapyramidal side effects, was inversely related to affinity at 5-HT1A receptors. As a result, preferential D2/5-HT1A antipsychotics displayed a large separation between doses producing 'antipsychotic-like' vs. cataleptogenic actions. These data support the contention that 5-HT1A receptor activation greatly reduces or prevents the cataleptogenic potential of novel antipsychotics. They also emphasize that interactions at 5-HT1A and D-2 receptors, and the nature of effects (antagonism or partial agonism) at the latter has a profound influence on pharmacological activities, and is likely to affect therapeutic profiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据