4.7 Article

Impact of disease characteristics on the efficacy of duloxetine in diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 664-669

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2009

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the impact of baseline disease variables related to diabetes and diabetic neuropathy severity on efficacy and safety of duloxetine in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The impact of baseline conditions was evaluated using the data from three pooled placebo-controlled studies for combined duloxetine, doses of 60 mg q.d. and 60 mg b.i.d., versus placebo. The primary. efficacy measure was the weekly mean of 24-h average pain severity, and night pain was the secondary measure. Safety and tolerability were assessed. RESULTS - There were no significant (P > 0.10) interactions of treatment by age (< 65 or >= 65 years), type of diabetes (type 1 or type 2), duration of diabetes (median split < 9.18 or >= 9.18 years), duration of diabetic neuropathy (< 2, 2 to < 6, or >= 6 years), severity of diabetic neuropathy (baseline Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument score < 5 or >= 5), baseline A1C level (median split < 7.6 or >= 7.6%), or baseline insulin use (yes/no). Significant interactions for both pain measures were observed in baseline pain subgroups (Brief Pain Inventory average pain, >= 6 and < 6). Duloxetine was more effective in the subgroup with more p. am. No significant association was found between any other subgroups (P > 0.10). Significant interactions (P < 0.1) occurred with treatment-emergent adverse events when stratified by subgroups. CONCLUSIONS - Pain severity but not variables related to diabetes or neuropathy may predict the effects of duloxetine in diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The efficacy of duloxetine is related to the initial pain severity and is generalizable across a broad spectrum of diabetic patients, including those with the highest severity of diabetes or neuropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据