4.2 Article

Forces applied by anterior and posterior teeth and roles of periodontal afferents during hold-and-split tasks in human subjects

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 178, 期 1, 页码 126-134

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0719-9

关键词

periodontal receptor; mechanoreceptor; tooth; mastication; sensory motor control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hold-and-split tasks were performed by 20 subjects (12 females and 8 males) using the right central incisors, canines, 2nd premolars, and 1st molars, respectively. Half a peanut was positioned on a transducer-equipped plate and the subject was instructed to hold the plate with the peanut between two antagonistic teeth, and not using more force than necessary. After ca. 3 s the subject was instructed to split the peanut in a natural manner. Each session consisted of a series of three in which the subject performed the hold-and-split task five times for each tooth. Thus, in total, data were obtained from 60 trials for each subject. The magnitude of the forces and the force rates used to split the peanut increased distally along the dental arch. However, the duration of the split phase was similar for the various teeth examined. During anesthesia of the periodontal ligament (four subjects), no significant changes were seen in the split phase. The forces used to hold the peanut between the teeth also increased distally along the dental arch: 0.60 N for the incisor, 0.77 N for the canine, 1.15 N for the 2nd premolar, and 1.74 N for the 1st molar. The difference in hold forces for the various teeth can be explained by the different sensitivity characteristics of the periodontal afferents innervating anterior and posterior teeth. During periodontal anesthesia, the magnitude and variability of the hold forces increased for all types of teeth, thus supporting the suggestion that periodontal afferent information is used in the regulation of the level of forces used to hold and manipulate morsels between the teeth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据