4.5 Article

Pro-inflammatory obesity in aged cannabinoid-2 receptor-deficient mice

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 366-379

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2015.169

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [CRC1039]
  2. Else Kroner Fresenius Foundation (Translational Research Innovation Pharma (TRIP) graduate school)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cannabinoid-1 receptor signaling increases the rewarding effects of food intake and promotes the growth of adipocytes, whereas cannabinoid-2 receptor (CB2) possibly opposes these pro-obesity effects by silencing the activated immune cells that are key drivers of the metabolic syndrome. Pro-and anti-orexigenic cannabimimetic signaling may become unbalanced with age because of alterations of the immune and endocannabinoid system. METHODS: To specifically address the role of CB2 for age-associated obesity, we analyzed metabolic, cardiovascular, immune and neuronal functions in 1.2-1.8-year-old CB2(-/-) and control mice, fed with a standard diet and assessed effects of the CB2 agonist, HU308, during high-fat diet (HFD) in 12-16-week-old mice. RESULTS: The CB2(-/-) mice were obese with hypertrophy of visceral fat, immune cell polarization toward pro-inflammatory subpopulations in fat and liver and hypertension, as well as increased mortality despite normal blood glucose. They also developed stronger paw inflammation and a premature loss of transient receptor potential responsiveness in primary sensory neurons, a phenomenon typical for small fiber disease. The CB2 agonist HU308 prevented HFD-evoked hypertension, reduced HFD-evoked polarization of adipose tissue macrophages toward the M1-like pro-inflammatory type and reduced HFD-evoked nociceptive hypersensitivity, but had no effect on weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: CB2 agonists may fortify CB2-mediated anti-obesity signaling without the risk of anti-CB1-mediated depression that caused the failure of rimonabant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据