4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Promoting active community environments through land use and transportation planning

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 397-407

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4s.397

关键词

physical activity; policy; urban planning; health disparities; prevention research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. To examine the role of land use and transportation plans as policy instruments for promoting active community environments. Design. Cross-sectional analysis using multilevel models to examine whether active community environment scores were associated with leisure and transportation-related physical activity (PA) and whether associations varied by household income. Setting. 67 North Carolina counties. Subjects. Adults (n = 6694) from pooled 2000 and 2002 North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) surveys. Measures. Active community environment scores, derived from a 2003 survey of planning directors, representing the presence of nonmotorized transportation improvements, mixed land use classification, and comprehensiveness of implementation tools. Dependent variables were self-reported PA measures from the BRFSS. Sociodemographic variables were derived from the 2000 U.S. Census of population. Results. After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, more favorable active community environment scores were significantly associated with leisure PA (p, =.001), transportation PA (p, <. 01), bicycling (p <.05), walking 150 minutes/week (p <. 001), and meeting PA recommendations (p <. 0001). In stratified analyses, lower income individuals (<$25, 000) living in high scoring counties were three times more likely to participate in transportation PA compared with those living in 1070 scoring counties (95% confidence interval, 1. 4, 7.3). Conclusions. This study identifies previously unexamined polity and institutional correlates of PA related to land use and transpartation planning. Plans may provide a means to incorporate Community support far active living into public policy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据