4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Building blocks of successful aging: A focus group study of older adults' perceived contributors to successful aging

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 194-201

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318030255f

关键词

successful aging; healthy aging; qualitative methods; resilience; psychosocial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The purpose of this study was to solicit the opinions of older adults about factors related to successful aging using focus group methods. Methods: Twelve focus groups were conducted with an average of six individuals per group. Participants included 72 community-dwelling older adults (age range: 60-99 years) recruited primarily from retirement communities in San Diego County, California. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory framework of Coding Consensus, Co-occurrence, and Comparison. Results: A total of 33 factors were identified, out of which four major themes emerged: attitude/adaptation, security/stability, health/wellness, and engagement/stimulation. Every focus group emphasized the need for a positive attitude, realistic perspective, and the ability to adapt to change. Security and stability encapsulated one's living environment, social support, and financial resources. General physical health and wellness were frequently mentioned, with mixed opinions on their necessity for successful aging. Finally, a sense of engagement, reflected in pursuit of continued stimulation, learning, feeling a sense of purpose in life, and being useful to others and to society, was considered a prominent aspect of successful aging. All four themes appeared to be interrelated such that engagement required a foundation of security and stability while positive attitude and adaptation strategies often compensated for impaired physical health. Conclusion: Older adults place greater emphasis on psychosocial factors as being key to successful aging, with less emphasis on factors such as longevity, genetics, absence of disease/disability, function, and independence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据