4.6 Article

Glucose- and time-dependence of islet amyloid formation in vitro

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.187

关键词

islet amyloid; human islet amyloid polypeptide; islets; beta-cell; insulin secretion; cell viability; amylin; mouse model; diabetes

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-74404, DK-17047, K01 DK074404, P30 DK017047] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Islet amyloid contributes to the loss of beta-cell mass in type 2 diabetes. To examine the roles of glucose and time on amyloid formation, we developed a rapid in vitro model using isolated islets from human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP) transgenic mice. Islets from hIAPP transgenic and non-transgenic mice were cultured for up to 7 days with either 5.5, 11.1, 16.7 or 33.3 mmol/l glucose. At various time-points throughout the culture period, islets were harvested for determination of amyloid and beta-cell areas, and for measures of cell viability, insulin content, and secretion. Following culture of hIAPP transgenic islets in 16.7 or 33.3 mmol/l glucose, amyloid formation was significantly increased compared to 5.5 or 11.1 mmol/l glucose culture. Amyloid was detected as early as day 2 and increased in a time-dependent manner so that by day 7, a decrease in the proportion of beta-cell area in hIAPP transgenic islets was evident. When compared to non-transgenic islets after 7-day culture in 16.7 mmol/l glucose, hIAPP transgenic islets were 24% less viable, had decreased beta-cell area and insulin content, but displayed no change in insulin secretion. Thus, we have developed a rapid in vitro model of light microscopy-visible islet amyloid formation that is both glucose- and time-dependent. Formation of amyloid in this model is associated with reduced cell viability and beta-cell loss but adequate functional adaptation. It thus enables studies investigating the mechanism(s) underlying the amyloid-associated loss of beta-cell mass in type 2 diabetes. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据