4.7 Article

Synthesis, structure, and redox properties of n-confused bis(porphyrinatonickel(II)) linked by o-xylene

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 1617-1626

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic061793e

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a reaction of 5,10,15,20-tetraaryl-2-aza-21-carbaporphyrinato nickel(II) 2 with alpha,alpha'-dibromo-o-xylene, three different complexes containing a xylene moiety were obtained in the presence of a proton scavenger. The products were characterized by mass spectrometry, UV-vis, NMR, and, in the case of the dimeric complex 3, X-ray crystallographic analysis (space group P (1) over bar, a = 16.455( 3) angstrom, b = 16.776( 3) angstrom, c = 18.400( 4) angstrom, alpha = 77.43(3)degrees, beta = 75.31(3)degrees, gamma = 66.20(3)degrees, V = 4457.1(19) angstrom(3), Z = 2). The monomeric species, diamagnetic 4 and paramagnetic 5, contain one and two bromoxylene residues, respectively, while in 3, the xylene bridge links two macrocyclic subunits, involving their internal carbons (C21) coordinated to diamagnetic nickel( II). Cyclovoltammetric measurements for o-xylene-linked bis(carbaporphyrinoid) 3 indicate cooperative effects resulting from an interaction between the subunits despite the isolation of their aromatic pi-bond systems. An EPR-controlled titration of 3 with bromine allows consecutive detection of the mono- and bis-oxidized species (3Br, 3Br(2)). The spectral patterns and spin-Hamiltonian parameters indicate metal-centered oxidation in 3Br (g(x) = 2.358, g(y) = 2.150, g(z) = 2.062, A(x)(Br) = 15, A(y)(Br) = 35, A(z)(Br) = 129 G) and interaction of two electron spins of nickel(III) ions in 3Br(2) (g(x) = 2.328, g(y) = 2.195, g(z) = 2.065, D = 0.0173 cm(-1), E= - 0.0018 cm(-1), A(z)(Br) = 63 G). A product of the chemical reduction of a protonated form of the dimer was also detected by means of EPR (g(1) = 2.298, g(2) = 2.218, g(3) = 2.192), although no interaction between the nickel( I) centers can be observed for the reduced species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据