4.7 Article

The luminosity function and star formation rate between redshifts of 0.07 and 1.47 for narrowband emitters in the subaru deep field

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 657, 期 2, 页码 738-759

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/510828

关键词

galaxies : distances and redshifts; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : luminosity function, mass function; galaxies : photometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SDF line-emitting galaxies in four narrowband filters at low and intermediate redshifts are presented. Broadband colors, follow-up optical spectroscopy, and multiple NB filters are used to distinguish H alpha, [O II], and [O III] emitters at z = 0.07-1.47 to construct their LFs. These LFs are derived down to faint magnitudes, allowing for an accurate determination of the faint-end slope. With a large (N similar to 200-900) sample for each redshift interval, a Schechter profile is fitted to each LF. Prior to dust extinction corrections, the [O III] and [O II] LFs agree reasonably well with those of Hippelein et al. The z = 0.08 H alpha LF, which reaches 2 orders of magnitude fainter than Gallego et al., is steeper by 25%. This indicates that there are more low-luminosity star-forming galaxies for z < 0.1. The faint-end slope alpha and phi(star) show a strong redshift evolution, while L-star shows little evolution. The evolution in alpha indicates that low-luminosity galaxies have a stronger evolution compared to brighter ones. Integrated SFR densities are derived via H alpha, [O III], and [O II] for 0.07 < z < 1.47. A steep increase in the SFR density, as a function of redshift, is seen for 0.4 < z < 0.9. For z > 1, the SFR densities are similar. The latter is consistent with previous UV and [O II] measurements. Below z < 0.4, the SFR densities are consistent with several H alpha, [O II], and UV measurements, but others are a factor of 2 higher. For example, the z = 0.066-0.092 LF agrees with Jones & Bland-Hawthorn, but at z = 0.24 and 0.40, their number densities are twice as high. This discrepancy can be explained by cosmic variance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据