4.7 Article

A highly obscured and strongly clustered galaxy population discovered with the Spitzer Space Telescope

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11357.x

关键词

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : statistics; cosmology : observations; cosmology : theory; large-scale structure of Universe; infrared : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The similar to 800 optically unseen ( R > 25.5) 24-mu m selected sources in the complete Spitzer First Look Survey sample with F-24m >= 0.35 mJy are found to be very strongly clustered. If, as indicated by several lines of circumstantial evidence, they are ultraluminous far-infrared galaxies at z similar or equal to 1.6 - 2.7, the amplitude of their spatial correlation function is very high. The associated comoving clustering length is estimated to be r(0) = 14.0(-2.4)(+2.1) Mpc, value which puts these sources amongst the most strongly clustered populations of our known Universe. Their 8 - 24 mu m colours suggest that the active galactic nucleus contribution dominates above F-24m similar or equal to 0.8 mJy, consistent with earlier analyses. The properties of these objects ( number counts, redshift distribution, clustering amplitude) are fully consistent with those of protospheroidal galaxies in the process of forming most of their stars and of growing their active nucleus, as described by the Granato et al. model. In particular, the inferred space density of such galaxies at z similar or equal to 2 is much higher than what is expected from most semi-analytic models. Matches of the observed projected correlation function w(theta) with models derived within the so-called halo occupation scenario show that these sources have to be hosted by haloes more massive than similar or equal to 10(13.4) M-.. This value is significantly higher than that for the typical galactic haloes hosting massive elliptical galaxies, suggesting a duration of the starburst phase of massive high-redshift dusty galaxies of T-B similar to 0.5 Gyr.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据