4.6 Article

Effects of anisomycin on consolidation and reconsolidation of a morphine-conditioned place preference

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 178, 期 1, 页码 146-153

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.12.013

关键词

place conditioning; morphine; reward; memory; reconsolidation; consolidation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein synthesis inhibitors block consolidation of memory and may also block the reconsolidation of a reactivated memory in paradigms of aversive learning, but the evidence for reconsolidation effects is conflicting in appetitive paradigms. We now report that intra-cerebroventricular (ICV) anisomycin (400 mu g) prevents consolidation of morphine-induced place preference (CPP), but does not impair its reconsolidation unless the reactivation procedure associates anisomycin with the morphine context. Rats were injected alternately with morphine (5 mg/kg, IP) or vehicle, and confined to one of two distinctive compartments in a three compartment apparatus. On a subsequent day rats were allowed to choose the compartment they preferred in a 20 min test session. In the first experiment, rats that were injected with vehicle or with anisomycin before or 3 It after training sessions, developed a CPP. However, rats that received anisomycin ICV immediately after training sessions did not develop a CPP. In experiment 2, rats received no ICV injections during initial training. Once a CPP was established, they received four additional training sessions on which they received vehicle or anisomycin ICV. All groups continued to prefer the morphine-paired compartment after reactivation sessions with vehicle or anisomycin ICV. In experiment 3, ICV anisomycin was administered selectively on morphine-paired reactivation trials or saline-paired reactivation trials and the CPP was weakened or strengthened, respectively. This suggests that associations between aversive effects of the amnestic treatment and the morphine context might mimic disruption of reconsolidation. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据