4.7 Article

Long QT syndrome and pregnancy

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 49, 期 10, 页码 1092-1098

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.09.054

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-51618, HL-33843] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives This study was designed to investigate the clinical course of women with long QT syndrome (LQTS) throughout their potential childbearing years. Background Only limited data exist regarding the risks associated with pregnancy in women with LQTS. Methods The risk of experiencing an adverse cardiac event, including syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, and sudden death, during and after pregnancy was analyzed for women who had their first birth from 1980 to 2003 (n = 391). Time-dependent Kaplam-Meler and Cox proportional hazard methods were used to evaluate the risk of cardiac events during different peripartum periods. Results Compared with a time period before a woman's first conception, the pregnancy time was associated with a reduced risk of cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.10 to 0.76, p = 0.01), whereas the 9-month postpartum time had an increased risk (HR 2.7, 95% Cl 1.8 to 4.3, p < 0.001). After the 9-month postpartum period, the risk was similar to the period before the first conception (HR 0.91, 95% Cl 0.55 to 1.5, p = 0.70). Genotype analysis (n = 153) showed that women with the LQT2 genotype were more likely to experience a cardiac event than women with the LQT1 or LQT3 genotype. The cardiac event risk during the high-risk postpartum period was reduced among women using beta-blocker therapy (HR 0.34, 95% Cl 0.14 to 0.84, p = 0.02). Conclusions Women with LQT; have a reduced risk for cardiac events during pregnancy, but an increased risk during the 9-month postpartum period, especially among women with the LQT2 genotype. Beta-blockers were associated with a reduction in cardiac events during the high-risk postpartum time period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据