Adsorbed gels versus brushes: Viscoelastic differences

It is of fundamental importance to be able to easily distinguish between the viscoelastic properties of a molecular gel (noncovalent cross-linked three-dimensional polymer structure) and a brush (polymer structure that emanates from a surface in three dimensions without cross-linking). This has relevance in biology and in designing surfaces with desired chemical and viscoelastic properties for nano and genomic technology applications. Agarose and thiol-tagged poly(ethylene glycol) were chosen as model systems, as they are known, on adsorption, to behave like a molecular gel and brush, respectively. Here, we focus on their viscoelastic differences using a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D). Changes in resonance frequency and dissipation for three overtones using QCM-D were fitted with the Voigt viscoelastic model to calculate the shear viscosity and shear modulus for the adsorbed agarose gel and the PEG brush. At a surface coverage of 500 ng/cm(2), the shear viscosities and shear moduli were 0.0025 +/- 0.0002 Pa-s and 2.0 +/- 0.17 x 10(5) Pa and 0.0010 +/- 0.0001 Pa-s and 5.0 +/- 0.3 x 10(4) Pa for the gel and brush, respectively. Thus, the adsorbed agarose gel layer was far more rigid than that of the covalently bound PEG brush due to its cross-linked network. Also, the diffusivity of agarose and PEG in solution was compared during adsorption onto a bare gold surface. The estimated value for the effective diffusivity of the PEG (without a thiol tag) and of the agarose gel was on the order of 10(-11) and 10(-15) m(2)/s, respectively. This low diffusivity for agarose supports the contention that it exists as a molecular gel with a H-bonded cross-linked network in aqueous solution. With the methods used here, it is relatively easy to distinguish the differences in viscoelastic properties between an adsorbed gel and brush.