4.7 Article

Conditional neuronal simian virus 40 T antigen expression induces Alzheimer-like tau and amyloid pathology in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 27, 期 11, 页码 2969-2978

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0186-07.2007

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; cell cycle; SV40 T antigen; amyloid plaque; neurofibrillary tangle; transgenic mice

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG12721, P50 AG005136, R01 AG012721, P50 AG05136] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [T32 00057] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large body of evidence has shown the activation of a cohort of cell cycle regulators and the duplication of DNA in degenerating neurons of Alzheimer's disease (AD) brain. Activation of these regulators and duplication of chromosomes precede neurodegeneration and formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), one of the diagnostic lesions of AD. These findings, in combination with evidence for cell cycle regulation of amyloid precursor protein and tau, has led to the hypothesis that reentry into the cell cycle underlies AD pathogenesis. To test this hypothesis directly, we have created transgenic mice with forced cell cycle activation in postmitotic neurons via conditional expression of the simian virus 40 large T antigen (TAg) oncogene. We show that TAg mice recapitulate the cell cycle changes seen in AD and display a neurodegenerative phenotype accompanied by tau pathology and NFT-like profiles. Moreover, plaque-like amyloid deposits, similar to those seen in AD, are also observed in the brains of TAg mice. These data provide support for an essential role of ectopic cell cycle activation in the generation of the characteristic pathological hallmarks of AD. Furthermore, our TAg mice are the first model to develop NFTs and amyloid pathology simultaneously and in the absence of any human transgenes. These mice will be useful for further defining the nongenetic mechanisms in AD pathogenesis and for the development of cell cycle-based therapies for AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据