4.7 Article

Combining radioimmunotherapy with antihypoxia therapy 2-deoxy-D-glucose results in reduction of therapeutic efficacy

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 1903-1910

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2094

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The efficacy of solid tumor radioimmunotherapy is reduced by heterogeneous tumor distribution of the radionuclide, with dose mainly deposited in the normoxic region and by the relative radioresistance of hypoxic tumor cells. In an attempt to overcome these challenges, radioimmunotherapy was combined with 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG), a hypoxia-selective cytotoxic inhibitor of glucose metabolism. Experimental Design: In vitro toxicity of 2DG in LS174T cultures was tested using a colony-forming assay. The effect of combining 2DG with radioimmunotherapy in vivo was tested by administering radiolabeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody ([(131)I]A5B7 IgG1 whole monoclonal) to nude mice bearing s.c. LS174T tumors, followed by 10 daily injections of 2DG (2.0 g/kg). Tumors were measured to assess therapeutic efficacy. Results: Data from in vitro studies confirmed 2DG cytotoxicity in this cell line. Greater toxicity was observed under standard laboratory conditions and in hypoxic cultures than at intermediate, physiologically relevant levels of glucose and oxygen. Alone, 2DG had no effect on in vivo tumor growth (P = 0.377 compared with saline-treated controls). Combination of radioimmunotherapy with 2DG reduced the therapeutic effect of radioimmunotherapy (e.g., 150 mu Ci (131)I alone mean survival time, 48.33 +/- 16.83 days; combined with 2DG, 30.67 +/- 5.62 days, P = 0,038). Conclusions: The combination investigated had a detrimental effect on survival. It is suggested that a cellular metabolic response to more aggressive therapy, previously reported in vitro, caused this. The results of this study have implications for the clinical application of combined cancer therapies with an antimetabolic modality component.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据