4.8 Article

Global diastolic strain rate for the assessment of left ventricular relaxation and filling pressures

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 115, 期 11, 页码 1376-1383

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.662882

关键词

diastole; echocardiography; heart failure; hemodynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Diastolic strain rate (SR) measurements that comprise all left ventricular (LV) segments are advantageous over myocardial velocity for assessment of diastolic function. Mitral early diastolic velocity (E)/SR ratio during the isovolumetric relaxation (IVR) period can be used to estimate LV filling pressures. Methods and Results-Simultaneous echocardiographic imaging and LV pressure measurements (7F catheters) were performed in 7 adult dogs. Loading conditions were altered by saline infusion and caval occlusion, and lusitropic state was changed by dobutamine and esmolol infusion. A curve depicting global SR was derived from each of the 3 apical views, and SR was measured during IVR (SRIVR) and early LV filling (SRE). SRIVR had a strong correlation with time constant of LV pressure decay during the IVR period (tau) (r=-0.83, P < 0.001), whereas SRE was significantly related to LV end-diastolic pressure (r=0.52, P=0.005) in the experimental stages where tau was < 40 ms. In 50 patients with simultaneous right heart catheterization and echocardiographic imaging, mitral E/SRIVR ratio had the best correlation with mean wedge pressure (r=0.79, P < 0.001), as well as in 24 prospective patients (r=0.84, P=0.001). E/SRIVR was most useful in patients with ratio of E to mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (E/Ea ratio) 8 to 15 and was more accurate than E/Ea in patients with normal ejection fraction and regional dysfunction (both P < 0.01). Conclusions-Global SRIVR by 2-dimensional speckle tracking is strongly dependent on LV relaxation. E/SRIVR can predict LV filling pressures with reasonable accuracy, particularly in patients with normal ejection fraction and in those with regional dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据