4.6 Article

Mechanism of apoptotic effects induced selectively by ursodeoxycholic acid on human hepatoma cell lines

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 1652-1658

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i11.1652

关键词

liver neoplasm; ursodeoxycholic acid; apoptosis; mechanism; cell lines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To investigate the effects of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) on apoptosis and proliferation of hepatoma cell lines. METHODS: Human hepatoma cell lines HepG2 and BEL 7402 were cultured in medium supplemented with different concentrations of UDCA, normal human hepatic line L-02 was used as control. Cell proliferation, apoptosis and gene expression were detected using methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay, flow cytometry, Western blot, DNA ladder assay, electron microscopy, and immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: Ursodeoxycholic acid inhibited the proliferation of HepG2 and BEL7402 cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. Ursodeoxycholic acid can change cell cycle distribution of HepG2 and BEL7402, the proportion of cells in G(0)-G(1) phase increased whereas the proportion of S phase cells and G(2)-M phase cells decreased. Ursodeoxycholic acid arrested the cell cycle in G(0)-G(1) phase by down-regulating the cell cycle related proteins cyclin D-1, D-3 and retinoblastoma protein (p(Rb)). The apoptotic rates of HepG2 and BEL7402 treated with UDCA (1.0 mmol/L) were significantly higher than those of control. In the HepG2 and BEL7402 treated with UDCA, expression of bcl-2 decreased whereas expression of Bax increased, the nuclear fragmentation and chromosomal condensed, cells shrank and lost attachment, apoptotic bodies and DNA ladders appeared. UDCA had no effect in inducing apoptosis on L-02 cell lines. CONCLUSION: UDCA can selectively inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of HepG2 and BEL7402 cell lines by blocking cell cycle and regulating the expression of Bax/bcl-2 genes. (c) 2007 The WJG Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据