4.7 Article

Direct inhibition of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by hydrogen sulfide: Contribution to dual modulation of vascular tension

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 232, 期 1-2, 页码 138-146

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2006.12.023

关键词

hydrogen sulfide; nitric oxide synthase; aorta; vascular endothelium; ATP-sensitive K+ channel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We characterized actions of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) on tension of isolated rat and mouse aortae, and then examined if H2S could directly modulate activity of endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase (eNOS). Isometric tension was recorded in rat and mouse aortic rings. Activity of recombinant bovine eNOS was determined as conversion of [H-3]-arginine into [H-3]-citrulline. NaHS, a H2S donor, caused contraction at low concentrations and relaxation at high concentrations in both rat and mouse aortae precontracted with phenylephrine. The contractile and relaxant effects of NaHS were enhanced and partially blocked, respectively, by the K-ATP(+) channel inhibitor glibenclamide in the rat, but not mouse, aortae. In the KCl-precontracted rat aorta, NaHS produced glibenclamide-resistant contraction and relaxation. NaHS produced only relaxation, but not contraction, in the endothelium-denuded aortae, and also in the endothelium-intact aortae in the presence of inhibitors of NOS or soluble guanylate cyclase. NaHS pretreatment greatly attenuated the relaxation induced by acetylcholine, but not by an NO donor, in the tissues. Finally, we found that NaHS inhibited the conversion of [H-3]-arginine into [H-3]-citrulline by recombinant eNOS. NaHS thus causes contraction and relaxation in rat and mouse aortae. K-ATP(+) channels are considered to contribute only partially to the NaHS-evoked relaxation. Most interestingly, our data demonstrate direct inhibition of eNOS by NaHS, probably responsible for its contractile activity, being evidence for a novel function of H2S. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据