4.6 Article

Purification, reconstitution, and characterization of the CpxRAP envelope stress system of Escherichia coli

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 282, 期 12, 页码 8583-8593

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M605785200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Escherichia coli the Cpx sensor regulator system senses different kinds of envelope stress and responds by triggering the expression of periplasmic folding factors and proteases. It consists of the membrane-anchored sensor kinase CpxA, the response regulator CpxR, and the periplasmic protein CpxP. The Cpx pathway is induced in vivo by a variety of signals including pH variation, osmotic stress, and misfolded envelope proteins and is inhibited by overproduced CpxP. Because it is not clear how the Cpx pathway is able to recognize and correspond to so many different signals we overproduced, solubilized, purified, and incorporated the complete membrane-integral CpxA protein into proteoliposomes to analyze its biochemical properties in more detail. Autokinase and phosphotransfer activities of the reconstituted CpxA-His, protein were stimulated by KCI. NaCl also stimulated the activities but to a lesser extent. Other osmotic active solutes as glycine betaine, sucrose, and proline had no effect. The system was further characterized by testing for susceptibility to sensor kinase inhibitors. Among these, Closantel inhibited the activities of solubilized but not of the reconstituted CpxA-HiS(6) protein. We further analyzed the effect of CpxP on CpxA activities. Purified tagless CpxP protein reduced the phosphorylation status of CpxA to 50% but had no effect on CpxA phosphotransfer or phosphatase activities. As the in vitro system excludes the involvement of other factors our finding is the first biochemical evidence for direct protein-protein interaction between the sensor kinase CpxA and the periplasmic protein CpxP resulting in a down-regulation of the autokinase activity of CpxA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据