4.6 Article

Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) with immobilized protein receptors: Comparison of response to ligand binding for direct protein immobilization and protein attachment via disulfide linker

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 3880-3885

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/la0628468

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R03-CA 89705] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Results from an investigation of the frequency response resulting from ligand binding for a genetically engineered hormone-binding domain of the alpha-estrogen receptor immobilized to a piezoelectric quartz crystal are reported. Two different approaches were used to attach a genetically altered receptor to the gold electrode on the quartz surface: (1) the mutant receptor containing a single solvent-exposed cysteine was directly attached to the crystal via a sulfur to gold covalent bond, forming a self-assembled protein monolayer, and (2) the N-terminal histidine-tagged end was utilized to attach the receptor via a 3,3-dithiobis[N-(5-amino-5-carboxypentyl)propionamide-N',N'-diacetic acid] linker complexed with nickel. Previous studies have shown that these engineered constructs bind 17 beta-estradiol and are fully functional. Exposure of the receptor directly attached to the piezoelectric crystal to the known ligand 17 beta-estradiol resulted in a measurable frequency response, consistent with a change in conformation of the receptor with ligand binding. However, no response was observed when the receptor immobilized via the linker was exposed to the same ligand. The presence of the linker between the quartz surface and the protein receptor does not allow the crystal to sense the conformational change in the receptor that occurs with ligand binding. These results illustrate that the immobilization strategy used to bind the receptor to the sensor platform is key to eliciting an appropriate response from this biosensor. This study has important implications for the development of QCM-based sensors using protein receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据