4.5 Article

A practical approach to computing power for generalized linear models with nominal, count, or ordinal responses

期刊

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 26, 期 7, 页码 1632-1648

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2617

关键词

likelihood ratio; ordinal data; power; regression; sample size; Wald statistic

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES012458] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data analysts facing study design questions on a regular basis could derive substantial benefit from a straightforward and unified approach to power calculations for generalized linear models. Many current proposals for dealing with binary, ordinal, or count outcomes are conceptually or computationally demanding, limited in terms of accommodating covariates, and/or have not been extensively assessed for accuracy assuming moderate sample sizes. Here, we present a simple method for estimating conditional power that requires only standard software for fitting the desired generalized linear model for a non-continuous outcome. The model is fit to an appropriate expanded data set using easily calculated weights that represent response probabilities given the assumed values of the parameters. The variance-covariance matrix resulting from this fit is then used in conjunction with an established non-central chi square approximation to the distribution of the Wald statistic. Alternatively, the model can be re-fit under the null hypothesis to approximate power based on the likelihood ratio statistic. We provide guidelines for constructing a representative expanded data set to allow close approximation of unconditional power based on the assumed joint distribution of the covariates. Relative to prior proposals, the approach proves particularly flexible for handling one or more continuous covariates without any need for discretizing. We illustrate the method for a variety of outcome types and covariate patterns, using simulations to demonstrate its accuracy for realistic sample sizes. Copyright (c) 2006 Jotin Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据