3.9 Article

Feeding opportunism of Knodus moenkhausii (Teleostei, Characidae):: an abundant species in streams of the northwestern in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil

期刊

IHERINGIA SERIE ZOOLOGIA
卷 97, 期 1, 页码 7-15

出版社

FUNDACAO ZOOBOTANICA RIO GRANDE SUL, MUSEU CIENCIAS NATURAIS
DOI: 10.1590/S0073-47212007000100002

关键词

nektonics; omnivory; feeding; tactics; seasonality

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Feeding opportunism of Knodus moenkhausii (Teleostei, Characidae): an abundant species in streams of the northwestern in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. In the present investigation we studied the feeding biology of Knodus moenkhausii (Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903) in streams of the Upper Parana river system in the state of Sao Paulo. In eight streams (R1-R8), K. moenkhausii consumed 18 items, of which algae, ephemeropteran nymphs, and dipteran larvae were the most frequent and dominant autochthonous items, as were terrestrial insects, hymenopterans, and spiders regarding allochthonous items. In the R2 stream, K. moenkhausii showed distinct diet, mostly due to depth, substrate type, and presence of riparian vegetation. In the R9 stream (monthly sampled for one year), 15 items were consumed, of which terrestrial insects predominated all year round; dipteran larvae and algae were least relevant during December-January (hot and wet period) and June-July (cold and dry period), respectively. During snorkeling observations in this stream, we recorded individuals performing drift feeding, picking at relatively small preys close to the substrate and submerged vegetation, and surface picking. The large diversity of consumed items - conditioned to habitat and seasonal variations - and the diversity of feeding tactics allow us to consider K. moenkhausii a rather opportunistic fish species. Such opportunism apparently reflects on the species abundance, showing its ability to allocate a significant part of its energy to reproduction, even in physically impacted habitats by human actions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据