4.7 Article

Clostridium difficile colitis that fails conventional metronidazole therapy:: response to nitazoxanide

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 705-710

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkl553

关键词

antibiotic-associated diarrhoea; vancomycin; C. difficile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Clostridium difficile-associated disease has increased in incidence and severity. Recommended treatments include metronidazole and vancomycin. Recent investigations, however, document the failure of metronidazole to cure a substantial proportion of patients with Clostridium difficile colitis, but oral administration of vancomycin raises concerns over selection of antibiotic-resistant organisms in the hospital environment. We have recently shown that nitazoxanide is as effective as metronidazole in initial therapy for C. difficile colitis. We hypothesized that this drug might be effective in treating patients who fail therapy with metronidazole. Methods: In the present study, we identified 35 patients who failed treatment with metronidazole for C. difficile colitis; failure was defined as either no improvement in symptoms or signs of disease (28 patients) after >= 14 days of treatment with metronidazole or prompt recurrence on at least two occasions after initially responding to such treatment (seven patients). These patients were ill with numerous co-morbidities. Nitazoxanide, 500 mg twice daily, was given for 10 days; results from all patients are included. Results: Twenty-six (74%) of 35 patients responded to nitazoxanide, of whom seven later had recurrent disease, yielding a cure rate of 19 of 35 (54%) from initial therapy. Three who initially failed and one who had recurrent disease were re-treated with, and responded to, nitazoxanide. Thus, the aggregate cure with nitazoxanide in this difficult-to-treat population was 23 of 35 (66%). Conclusions: Nitazoxanide appears to provide effective therapy for patients with C. difficile colitis who fail treatment with metronidazole.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据