4.7 Article

Human T and natural killer cells possess a functional renin-angiotensin system: Further mechanisms of angiotensin II-induced inflammation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 1093-1102

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2006070707

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [P01 AI50157] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays an important role in the regulation of inflammation and in the progression of chronic kidney disease. Accumulation of inflammatory cells into the renal parenchyma has been a hallmark of chronic kidney disease; however, little is known concerning the presence and the function of RAS elements in T and natural killer (NK) cells. Here is reported a co-stimulatory effect of angiotensin II (AngII) by showing an augmentation of mitogen and anti-CD3-stimulated T and NK cell proliferation with AngII treatment. Angiotensinogen and AngI also generated the same effect, suggesting that NK and T cells have functional renin and angiotensin-converting enzyme activity. Indeed, they express renin, the renin receptor, angiotensinogen, and angiotensin-converting enzyme by mRNA analysis. Flow cytometric analysis and Western blot revealed angiotensin receptor 2 (AT(2)) expression in T and NK cells, whereas AT(1) expression was found in T and NK cells and monocytes by Western blot. These receptors were shown to be functional in calcium signaling, chemotaxis, and proliferation. However, AT, and AT2 antagonists alone or in combination were unable to abrogate completely the effects of AngII, suggesting that another AngII receptor may also be functional in leukocytes. This is the first study to show that T and NK cells are fully equipped with RAS elements and are potentially capable of producing and delivering AngII to sites of inflammation. Because their chemotaxis is enhanced by AngII, this creates a potential inflammatory amplification system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据